内容摘要：The Washington Department of Natural Resources this week used one of its firefighting helicopters to haul abandoned boats off an uninhabited island in the southernmost reaches of Puget Sound, where the vessels had come to rest after drifting with the currents, and fly them to the mainland to be deconstructed later.

The Washington Department of Natural Resources this week used one of its firefighting helicopters to haul abandoned boats off an uninhabited island in the southernmost reaches of Puget Sound, where the vessels had come to rest after drifting with the currents, and fly them to the mainland to be deconstructed later.

a possible effort to evade its initial ruling by temporarily freezing deportations from northern Texas.Boasberg wrote that he accepted the administration’s declaration, filed under seal, providing details of the government’s deal with El Salvador to house deportees and how that means the Venezuelans are technically under the legal control of El Salvador and not the United States. He added, while noting there is a criminal penalty for providing false testimony, that believing those representations was “rendered more difficult given the Government’s troubling conduct throughout this case.”

He also noted parallels with another case where the Trump administration admitted itdeported a Maryland man to El Salvador and has been ordered by a judge, appellate judges and the U.S. Supreme Court to “facilitate” his return., remains in El Salvador more than two months later.

ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt welcomed Boasberg’s ruling.“This is a significant step forward to getting these men the chance to show that they should not ever have been removed under a wartime authority,” Gelernt told reporters in San Diego after a hearing in a separate, unrelated case.

In that case, a federal judge Wednesday found the Trump administration violated a settlement to provide legal advice to thousands of families that were separated at the border. U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw said he would likely decide on concrete steps by early next week.

In the AEA case, Boasberg’s order is only the latest of a blizzard of legal rulings.“one big beautiful bill.”

has projected that the legislation would increase federal deficits by about $2.4 trillion over 10 years. That’s a problem for a Republican Congress that has spent much of the past four years criticizing former President Joe Biden and Democrats for the nation’s rising debt levels.The White House and Republican leaders in Congress are taking issue with CBO’s findings. They say economic growth will be higher than the office is projecting, resulting in more revenue coming into government coffers. Meanwhile, Democrats are touting CBO’s findings as evidence of the bill’s failings.

Here’s a look at the office at the center of Washington’s latest political tug-of-war.Lawmakers established the Congressional Budget Office more than 50 years ago to provide objective, impartial analysis to support the budget process. The CBO is required to produce a cost estimate for nearly every bill approved by a House or Senate committee and will weigh in earlier when asked to do so by lawmakers.