内容摘要：If an item fails to scan, customers are shown a video on the self-service screen of their attempt, accompanied by a message saying: "The last item wasn't scanned properly. Remove from bagging area and try again."

If an item fails to scan, customers are shown a video on the self-service screen of their attempt, accompanied by a message saying: "The last item wasn't scanned properly. Remove from bagging area and try again."

"This was ultimately a negotiation in which President Trump was threatening other countries with a big stick and that stick just got considerably more ephemeral."US President Donald Trump has been allowed to keep collecting tariffs while the White House appeals against a ruling that dealt a major blow to a key part of his economic policies.

the Court of International Trade ruled that an emergency law invoked by Trump did not give the president unilateral authority to impose tariffs on nearly every one of the world's countries.The New York-based court said the US Constitution gave Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other nations, and that this was not superseded by the president's remit to safeguard the economy.Small businesses and a group of states had challenged the tariffs that have shaken up the world economic order.

The ruling was based on two separate cases. The nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center brought one case on behalf of several small businesses that import goods from countries that were targeted by the duties, while a coalition of US state governments also challenged the import taxes.The two cases marked the first major legal challenges to Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs and went to the Court of International Trade, a part of the federal court system with specific authority over trade.

A three-judge panel ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law that Trump cited to justify the tariffs, did not give him the power to impose the sweeping import taxes.

The court also blocked a separate set of levies the Trump administration imposed onHe was returned to Libya and spent the next three years living in a villa in Tripoli before finally succumbing to his illness in 2012.

Ten years later, Libyan Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir Al-Marimi, known as Masud, was taken into American custody after being removed from his home in Tripoli.He is awaiting trial in the USA, accused of building the bomb that destroyed Pan Am 103.

Today, the town of Lockerbie remembers the disaster in its own, quiet, way.Pupils from the secondary school can apply for a scholarship to spend a year at Syracuse University, in memory of 35 students from there who died in the bombing.