内容摘要：On the 18th, she pulled her approach into a patch of crushed coral to a short-sided pin. She didn’t catch enough of the golf ball and left it in the sandy area, then caught all ball and sent it 25 feet past the pin on the collar. Two putts from there led to bogey.

On the 18th, she pulled her approach into a patch of crushed coral to a short-sided pin. She didn’t catch enough of the golf ball and left it in the sandy area, then caught all ball and sent it 25 feet past the pin on the collar. Two putts from there led to bogey.

“The neighbors have welcomed them,” Llaguna said. “So they don’t mind if they’re in their backyard or in their front lawn. Nobody messes with them, they’re our mascot.”Llaguna said the roosters’ crowing at sunrise symbolizes renewal.

“The Cubans came to Little Havana when the revolution came into Cuba,” Llaguna said. “They settled in this neighborhood, so they had a new beginning in Little Havana.”Llaguna’s store is filled with rooster merchandise, including shirts, hats, glasses and magnets.“Everybody wants a rooster,” Llaguna said. “They want to take home a memento. They want have a memory of a fun time. And the rooster has turned into that.”

As the feral roosters spread, they might soon face competition from the invasive peacocks that have taken over neighboring communities like Coconut Grove and Coral Gables.“The peacocks have very bad tempers,” George said. “They’re pretty ill-mannered, and they tend to be a lot bigger than the chickens, and they make a lot of noise.”

But George is more concerned that development and gentrification in older neighborhoods could eventually lead to the disappearance of their feathered residents. When 50-year-old houses are replaced with brand new condos, George isn’t sure whether people spending over $1 million for a home are going to tolerate the loud birds.

“Even with hurricane windows, I just don’t think a lot of these people are gonna put up with it as the neighborhood becomes richer.” George said. “And I think they’re gonna really lean on the city’s code enforcement for it.”The lawsuit filed April 1

sought to immediately halt, alleging that it would decimate public health infrastructure across the country. The money, allocated by Congress during the pandemic, supported COVID-19 initiatives and

The federal government argued that because the pandemic is over, the states no longer need the money. But McElroy, who granted a temporary restraining order last month in the case, wrote in her decision that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services doesn’t have the power to decide that money isn’t necessary anymore.She went on to say that the agency ignored multiple requirements that govern how block grant programs are terminated, calling the federal government’s argument for how it handled the situation “puzzling.”