内容摘要：At Mar-a-Lago, where so much of the property is exposed, Williams said robotic dogs are long overdue. “They can cover a lot more area” than humans alone, Williams said of the dogs, which he expects will become more of a common sight over time.

At Mar-a-Lago, where so much of the property is exposed, Williams said robotic dogs are long overdue. “They can cover a lot more area” than humans alone, Williams said of the dogs, which he expects will become more of a common sight over time.

Today's debate was surprising in terms of the dynamic between the candidates. I think it was a bit more centred around content than blaming one another.I find it refreshing that Carney is not a career politician, and it showed in the debate. The way he spoke was business-like - in both the French and English debates - and he was able to express his points very clearly compared to practiced politicians.

Pierre Poilievre felt like a broken record, constantly looking at the camera to send his message. It was like watching an advertisement.My values align with the NDP, but I don't think Singh can be a leader for the Canadians. So my vote is still for Carney, as I think he has the best plan.The debate was all very respectful. I didn't get a sense that anyone was having a go at each other, unlike in the good old days of hot-headed debate - those days seem to be over.

Pierre Poilievre was the winner at the end of the day. I don't think there was a big difference between him and Carney, but Poilievre was better for sure.Poilievre made some good points, pointing to the nine-and-a-half years of the Liberals in power and the catastrophic mess they've made. Carney tried to pitch himself as some kind of Lancelot figure, but didn't come across as different to what was there before.

At the end of it, I was disappointed. I didn't feel anyone left the table with a phenomenal finish.

I think it was a pretty good debate, and nothing too crazy was said. The Liberal and Conservative leaders stayed on track, sticking to their initial messages.He was given a stalking prevention order in November 2023, but breached this the following month when he published the contents of court paperwork on social media that identified his victims.

In December 2024, he pleaded guilty to stalking, as well as public nuisance in relation to his protest at the council offices."Leo Deen is a resentful stalker who believed he was the victim of a conspiracy between his victims, police and the local authority," said Det Sgt Nichol McClellan.

She added: "Nothing could be further from the truth, and Deen's choices ruined the lives of several members of a family, which caused misery for the same local community he professes to care about."Deen was also found guilty on Friday in relation to a number of sexual offences, following a trial in April.