内容摘要：“Think about the ... decades (and) decades of just fighting to get the conversation about race even centered in the American psyche,” she said. “Now people talk about it as a general course of fact.”

“Think about the ... decades (and) decades of just fighting to get the conversation about race even centered in the American psyche,” she said. “Now people talk about it as a general course of fact.”

, ruling that he’d overstepped his authority.The emergency powers act, the

declared, did not allow the use of global tariffs. Moreover, it said, the tariffs did not address the problems the president had identified. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling, and a federal appeals court on Thursday allowed the government to continue collecting the IEEPA import taxes while the appeals continue.Congress has made some motion toward reasserting its authority. Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington, for instance, have introduced legislation that would require presidents to justify new tariffs to Congress. Lawmakers would then have 60 days to approve the tariffs. Otherwise, they would expire.But their proposal appears to stand little chance of becoming law, given most Republican lawmakers’ deference to Trump and the president’s veto power.

Yes, and some of his top aides swiftly promised to do so. Still, to do it legally will take longer and he may not be able to reinstate every duty that he previously imposed, or threatened to impose.In fact, the court laid out a bit of a road map, pointing out that if Trump wanted to impose duties to reduce U.S. trade deficits, he should use a different law that was expressly intended for that purpose — specifically, Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Yet that law only allows tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days.

The broader point of the court’s ruling is that since Congress has the power to impose tariffs under the Constitution, it can only delegate that power to the president under specific laws the president has to follow.

There are several Trump could use, including Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, but that does require an investigation of another country’s trade practices to establish that they either violated a trade agreement or engaged in unfair trade practices.It may seem unusual to discuss future fertility when a family is reeling from the diagnosis of a child’s cancer. But 85% of children with cancer now survive to adulthood and about 1 in 3 are left infertile from chemotherapy or radiation.

Young adults with cancer can bank sperm, eggs or sometimes embryos ahead of treatment. But children diagnosed before puberty don’t have that option because they’re not yet producing mature sperm or eggs.Boys are born with stem cells inside spaghetti-like tubes in the testes, cells that start producing sperm after puberty sparks a rise in testosterone. With

, Pitt reproductive scientist Kyle Orwig studies how to preserve and potentially use testicular cells to restore fertility.This article is part of AP’s Be Well coverage, focusing on wellness, fitness, diet and mental health.