conservative forces have called for Paetongtarn to face charges and resign.
The circumstances aren't specifically laid out in the Constitution - but they have been subsequently interpreted to include actual or anticipated attacks or to advance other important national interests.What does the Constitution say about military action?There are two parts of the US Constitution that are relevant here: Article I and Article II.
told BBC Verify he didn't believe Trump had the authority to launch the latest strikes as there wasn't a sudden attack to repel.Republican Congressman Thomas Massie said on X that the strikes were not Constitutional.And experts also said that presidents using their authority to order military actions without getting approval from Congress has become more common.
GettyQasem Soleimani was killed in 2020 by a US airstrikeThis authority has been repeatedly used by presidents throughout our history.Article I specifically lists the ability to declare war as one of Congress' powers.
but rather simply informed several Republican leaders.
according to experts at the Council for Foreign Relations.meaning that MPs were allowed to decide for or against the bill according to their conscience.
is considered murder or manslaughter.Proponents included Esther Rantzen.
MPs passed the bill by 314 votes to 291.isVideoCollection = false; Campaigners in favor and against the bill on the streets of Westminster Friday.