内容摘要：For seniors, there would be a bolstered $4,000 deduction on Social Security wages for those with adjusted incomes no higher than $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples.

For seniors, there would be a bolstered $4,000 deduction on Social Security wages for those with adjusted incomes no higher than $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples.

The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’sfor working with philanthropies, a

of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.WASHINGTON (AP) — El gobierno del presidente estadounidense Donald Trump solicitó el viernes a la Corte Suprema federal que le permita reanudar su reducción de la fuerza laboral federal, mientras avanza una demanda presentada por sindicatos y ciudades.El Departamento de Justicia está impugnando una orden emitida la semana pasada por un juez federal en San Francisco que suspendió temporalmente los esfuerzos de Trump para reducir un gobierno federal que él considera inflado y costoso.

La orden de restricción temporal emitida por la jueza federal de distrito, Susan Illston, cuestionó si el gobierno republicano de Trump estaba actuando legalmente al intentar reducir la fuerza laboral federal.Illston, nombrada por el presidente demócrata Bill Clinton, ordenó a numerosas agencias federales que dejaran de actuar según la orden ejecutiva de Trump sobre la fuerza laboral firmada en febrero y un memorando posterior emitido por el Departamento de Eficiencia Gubernamental y la Oficina de Gestión de Personal.

El procurador general D. John Sauer pidió a la corte que suspendiera rápidamente el fallo, diciendo a los jueces que Illston excedió su autoridad.

La orden de Illston expira la próxima semana, a menos que se extienda.That will make a huge difference in communities like her home of Stonington, the busiest lobster fishing port in the country, Olsen said. It’s a tiny island town of winding streets, swooping gulls and mansard roof houses with an economy almost entirely dependent on commercial fishing, some three hours up the coast from Portland, Maine’s biggest city.

Olsen knows firsthand how much has changed over the years. Hundreds of fish and shellfish populations globally have dwindled to dangerously low levels, alarming scientists and prompting the restrictions and catch limits that Trump’s order could wash away with the stroke of a pen. But she’s heartened that the livelihoods of people who work the traps and cast the nets have become a priority in faraway places where they often felt their voices weren’t heard.“I do think it’s time to have the conversation on what regulations that the industry does need. We’re fishing different than we did 100 years ago,” she said. “If everything is being looked at, we should be looking at the regulations within the fishing industry.”

But if fishing and lobstering interests finally have a seat at the table, the questions become how much seafood can be served there — and for how long. Trump’s April 17 order, called “Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness,” promises an overhaul of the way America fishes, and cites a national seafood trade deficit of more than $20 billion as the reason to do it. The order calls on the federal government to reduce the regulatory burden on fishermen by later this month.It arrives at a time when conservation groups and many marine scientists say the ocean needs more regulation, not less. One oft-cited 2020