Environment

.css-v2kfba{height:100%;width:100%;}

时间:2010-12-5 17:23:32  作者:Technology   来源:National  查看:  评论:0
内容摘要:Dr Rueger joked that a little bit of movie rewriting might be necessary, with a new chapter ahead for Nemo.

Dr Rueger joked that a little bit of movie rewriting might be necessary, with a new chapter ahead for Nemo.

The Senate followed the House in voting to effectively kill the law, nullifying a waiver granted to the state that had allowed it to set stricter auto emissions standards than those set by the federal government.The vote is a win for Republicans, energy firms and carmakers. It's a blow to Democrats and environmental groups, which saw the rule as a key step to addressing pollution and climate change.

.css-v2kfba{height:100%;width:100%;}

President Donald Trump is expected to sign the measure, setting the stage for a legal battle."This federal government overreach is illogical, politically motivated and it comes at the expense of Californian's lives and livelihoods," said California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who said the state would sue over the move.Trump had previously attacked California's plan to phase out gas cars, which, in part because of the state's size, was expected to have significant influence over the wider car industry in the US.

.css-v2kfba{height:100%;width:100%;}

Roughly a dozen other states, including New York, Massachusetts, Colorado and New Mexico had intended to follow the California rules, representing more than a third of the car market, according to the industry.Electric vehicles, including hybrids, represented about 10% of new car sales in the US, compared with roughly 30% in the UK last year,

.css-v2kfba{height:100%;width:100%;}

In the UK, the

to phase out sales of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030.Add in the generous prize money on offer in Europe's elite competition, and that is how we have calculated that Wednesday's defeat by Tottenham has, at a conservative estimate, cost United £100m.

As has been widely reported, a second round of redundancies is on the way, this time affecting the football department. The reductions are likely to affect the scouting, medical and science teams.There has been no word on whether that is likely to be the end of the matter. But it is clear, from axing of staff trips, free lunches and other perks, nothing is off limits in Sir Jim Ratcliffe's determination to make United a leaner organisation.

But these cost-cutting initiatives can only do so much. As with any Premier League club, by far the biggest expenditure is on transfer fees and player wages. If this season is any guide, United, who have spent in excess of £900m on transfers over the past five years and whose last annual wage bill they confirmed at £365m, have been awful at both of these fundamental elements.United say funds will be available, but what does that mean?

copyright © 2016 powered by FolkMusicInsider   sitemap