Soccer

What separates the ultrarich from the just-plain-rich? The gigayacht.

时间:2010-12-5 17:23:32  作者:Tennis   来源:Climate  查看:  评论:0
内容摘要:could increase costs for U.S. Chipotle locations.

could increase costs for U.S. Chipotle locations.

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) —on Australia’s east coast have left four people dead and one missing, officials said Friday as rain eased over the disaster area.

What separates the ultrarich from the just-plain-rich? The gigayacht.

Some 50,000 people have been isolated by flooding along the coast of New South Wales state north of Sydney after days of heavy rain. The low-pressure weather system that brought the deluge had moved further south to Sydney and its surrounds Friday.Four bodies have been retrieved from floodwaters in New South Wales since Wednesday. Three of the victims had driven into floodwaters, while a man’s body had been found on the veranda of his flooded home.The latest victim was a man in his 70s whose body was found in a car in floodwater Friday near Coffs Harbour, a police statement said. The car had run off the road.

What separates the ultrarich from the just-plain-rich? The gigayacht.

A 49-year-old man remains missing after walking near a flooded road at Nymboida on Wednesday night.and New South Wales Premier Christopher Minns on Friday were inspecting devastated communities, some of which had been inundated by the highest floodwaters on record.

What separates the ultrarich from the just-plain-rich? The gigayacht.

Minns praised emergency services and volunteers for rescuing 678 people from floodwaters in recent days, including 177 in the past 24 hours.

“It’s an amazing, heroic logistical effort where, in very difficult circumstances, many volunteers put themselves in harm’s way to rescue a complete stranger. And over the coming days and weeks, we will hear scores of stories of locals being plucked out of impossible, desperate situations,” Minns told reporters in Maitland in the flood area.The case is being considered in Texas by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump nominee who once ruled in favor of halting approval for the drug.

Kacsmaryk’s original ruling came in a lawsuit filed by anti-abortion groups. It was narrowed by an appeals court before being tossed out by the Supreme Court, which found the plaintiffs lacked the legal right to sue.The three states later moved to revive the case, arguing they did have legal standing because access to the drug undermined their abortion laws.

But the Department of Justice attorneys said the states can’t just piggyback on the earlier lawsuit as a way to keep the case in Texas.Nothing is stopping the states from filing the lawsuit someplace else, attorney Daniel Schwei wrote, but the venue has to have some connection to the claims being made.

copyright © 2016 powered by FolkMusicInsider   sitemap