内容摘要：During the Biden administration, Israel faced some pushback from U.S. officials over what they saw as undue harm to civilians and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

During the Biden administration, Israel faced some pushback from U.S. officials over what they saw as undue harm to civilians and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

while providing Kyiv a measure of assurance about continued American support in its grinding war with Russia.“This agreement signals clearly to Russia that the Trump administration is committed to a peace process centered on a free, sovereign, and prosperous Ukraine over the long term,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. “President Trump envisioned this partnership between the American people and the Ukrainian people to show both sides’ commitment to lasting peace and prosperity in Ukraine.”

The announcement comes at a critical moment in the three-year war as Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with both sides. The signing comes two months after a different but similar agreement was nearly signed before being derailed in ainvolving President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.Trump has long criticized Zelenskyy, saying he didn’t “have the cards” to win the war and blaming him for

by not giving up Crimea, but in recent days hasas well, saying he was complicating negotiations with “very bad timing” in launching deadly strikes on Kyiv.

Trump said Wednesday night on NewsNation that the deal, “in theory,” means that the U.S. will get more from Ukraine than it contributed. “I wanted to be protected,” he said, adding that he didn’t want to be looking “foolish” by not getting money back for the investment.

For Ukraine, the agreement is seen as key to ensuring its access to future U.S. military aid.David S. Cohen, profesor de la Facultad de Derecho Thomas R. Kline de la Universidad de Drexel en Filadelfia, dijo que el hospital podría estar más preocupado por parte de la ley que otorga al feto derechos legales como “miembro de la especie Homo sapiens”.

Según Cohen, esto podría llevar al centro a considerar a Smith y al feto como dos pacientes y que, una vez que Smith estaba con soporte vital, tenían la obligación legal de mantener al feto con vida, incluso después de la muerte de la madre.“Este es el tipo de casos sobre los que los profesores de derecho llevan hablando mucho tiempo cuando se refieren a la personalidad jurídica del feto”, apuntó.

Nabilah Islam Parkes, diputada estatal demócrata de Atlanta, dijo el viernes que envió una carta al fiscal general del estado, Chris Carr, solicitando un dictamen jurídico sobre la aplicación de la ley del aborto de Georgia cuando una mujer embarazada está en muerte cerebral.Los grupos antiaborto están divididos sobre si deben apoyar las disposiciones acerca de la personalidad jurídica del feto, que están recogidas en la legislación de al menos 17 estados, según el grupo activista Pregnancy Justice.