内容摘要：Murphy said they concluded the joint order would not go ahead "and that our people on the ground for the Northern Ireland Bureau in Beijing would then pursue their own contacts".

Murphy said they concluded the joint order would not go ahead "and that our people on the ground for the Northern Ireland Bureau in Beijing would then pursue their own contacts".

As a member, or even leader one day? As ever with Nigel Farage, you can't really ever rule anything out. As he made clear in his speech, he's not afraid of changing his mind.A mother has said EasyJet should "treat people with a bit of common sense and a bit more kindness" after the airline told her she must pay to bring extra hand luggage containing breast milk and a pump onto a flight.

Daisy Crawford was travelling to Belfast on Sunday after spending time with family in Bristol.Ms Crawford said "there was no understanding" from staff.In a statement, EasyJet said: "We are very sorry for Ms Crawford's experience while boarding her flight, as this is not the level of service we expect."

Ms Crawford said she researched the rules on travelling with breast milk before flying., she said she faced no issues travelling out of Belfast, but "on the way back I went through security fine, and then it wasn't until I was at the gate that they just said, 'No, you have to pay an additional charge for this'.

"When I said, 'Oh sorry, it's breast milk; it's separate'. They said, 'It doesn't matter, you've got to pay'.

"It's embarrassing enough to have to divulge what it is in the first place.A public inquiry held in the aftermath found there were "no villains" and only human beings who made mistakes.

However, making its application, Phoenix Law said there had been an "irregularity of proceedings in the original inquest" which had not commented on or addressed "substantial issues" including the cause of the fire.The firm said there was "substantial fresh evidence which was not heard at the original inquest or commission which call into question the central conclusions", suggesting the forensic analysis of the time was now "unreliable".

A spokesman also said several experts had provided written support for a fresh investigation into the fire "on the premise that there have been significant developments within the forensic science on how fires are investigated".He said they had pointed to the