内容摘要：Some of the rules have been in place for years, while others were written under President Joe Biden and have not yet taken effect because of court challenges or because they are designed to kick in during later years.

Some of the rules have been in place for years, while others were written under President Joe Biden and have not yet taken effect because of court challenges or because they are designed to kick in during later years.

A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices.That exception has come up in other cases, including in

Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting atin Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in whichThe families eventually secured a landmark $73 million settlement with Remington, the maker of the rifle.

The Supreme Court’s ruling doesn’t appear to affect similar cases, said David Pucino, legal director at the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. “All survivors, in the United States, in Mexico, and anywhere else, deserve their day in court, and we will continue to support them in their fight for justice,” he said.Associated Press writer Fabiola Sánchez in Mexico City contributed to this story.

Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump intensified his assertions — without evidence — that officials using an autopen undermined the actions of his predecessor, Joe Biden, even suggesting Thursday that “essentially whoever used the autopen was president.”Durante su primer mandato, Trump emitió una orden ejecutiva en enero de 2017 prohibiendo viajar a Estados Unidos a ciudadanos de siete países predominantemente musulmanes. Fue uno de los momentos más caóticos y confusos de su joven presidencia.

La orden, a menudo referida como la “prohibición musulmana” o la “prohibición de viaje”, fue reformulada en medio de desafíos legales, hasta que una versión fue confirmada por la Corte Suprema en 2018.Trump y otros han defendido la prohibición inicial por motivos de seguridad nacional, argumentando que estaba destinada a proteger al país y no se fundaba en un sesgo contra los musulmanes. Sin embargo, el presidente había abogado por una prohibición explícita de musulmanes durante su primera campaña para la Casa Blanca.

Amiri informó desde Naciones Unidas. Regina García Cano, Rebecca Santana, Jon Gambrell, Ellen Knickmeyer, Omar Farouk, Nasser Karimi, Elliot Spagat, Elena Becatoros y Danica Coto también contribuyeron a este informe.Esta historia fue traducida del inglés por un editor de AP con la ayuda de una herramienta de inteligencia artificial generativa.