内容摘要：“The Government of Tanzania cannot hide behind national sovereignty to justify committing serious crimes and human rights violations against its own citizens and other East Africans,” the International Commission of Jurists in Kenya said in a statement.

“The Government of Tanzania cannot hide behind national sovereignty to justify committing serious crimes and human rights violations against its own citizens and other East Africans,” the International Commission of Jurists in Kenya said in a statement.

Indian media constructed a national identity of moral power: a state forced into action, responding not with rage but with restraint, armed not just with BrahMos missiles but with dharma – righteous duty and moral order. The enemy wasn’t Pakistan, the narrative insisted — it was terror. And who could object to that?This is the genius of framing. Constructivist theory tells us that states act based on identities, not just interests. And identity is forged through language. In India’s case, the media crafted a story where military might was tethered to moral clarity. The strikes weren’t aggression — they were catharsis. They weren’t war — they were therapy.

But here’s the thing: therapy for whom?Scene two: The sacred defenceThree days later, Pakistan struck back. Operation Bunyan Marsoos — Arabic for “iron wall” — was declared. The name alone tells you everything. This wasn’t just a retaliatory strike; it was a theological assertion, a national sermon. The enemy had dared to trespass. The response would be divine.

Pakistani missiles reportedly rained down on Indian military sites: brigade headquarters, an S-400 system, and military installations in Punjab and Jammu.Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif

proclaimed that Pakistan had “avenged the 1971 war”, in which it had capitulated and allowed Bangladesh to secede. That’s not battlefield strategy. That’s myth-making.

The media in Pakistan amplified this narrative with patriotic zeal. Indian strikes were framed as war crimes, mosques hit, civilians killed. Photographs of rubble and blood were paired with captions about martyrdom. The response, by contrast, was precise, moral, and inevitable.“The evil of anti-Semitism must be eradicated from our society,” she said. “The Department of Justice will be prosecuting the perpetrator responsible for this to the fullest extent of the law.”

She also tied the shooting to Trump’s crackdown on anti-Semitism, which has largely focused on antiwar student protesters demonstrating against Israel’s war on Gaza.“Secretary of State Marco Rubio has revoked thousands of student visas from campuses where these pro-Hamas terrorist campus agitators and violent protests took place,” Leavitt explained.

“We’ve also withheld funding from those varied campuses as well in an effort to combat anti-Semitism. So the president has made it very clear that such hatred will have no place in our country.”Israeli officials also strongly condemned the incident, describing it as a “despicable act of hatred”. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said after the shooting: “We are witnessing the terrible price of anti-Semitism and the wild incitement against the State of Israel.